GLP-1 Tirzepatide ReviewIndependent · S.J Partners LLC
Prices 6 verified of 54 Rubric v1.0-draft Prices verified 0 of 54 Evidence records 32 verified Corrections open log

Trial review

SYNERGY-NASH: Tirzepatide for MASH With Liver Fibrosis, Explained

Tirzepatide for MASH with liver fibrosis

Direct answer

SYNERGY-NASH was a phase 2, dose-finding, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, 130 sites in 10 countries funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Tirzepatide was superior to placebo for MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Reported resolution rates differ between secondary sources: one gives 51.8%, 62.8% and 73.3% at 5, 10 and 15 mg against 13.2% placebo; another gives 62% at 15 mg against 10% placebo. That figure belongs to the population, dose and 52 weeks shown below, and describes a group average rather than a prediction for any individual.

Answer last reviewed: 2026-07-24Evidence:
SYNERGY-NASH at a glanceVerified
DesignPhase 2, dose-finding, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, 130 sites in 10 countries
PopulationAdults 18-80 with biopsy-confirmed MASH, stage F2 or F3 fibrosis, BMI 27-50, with or without type 2 diabetes, NAFLD activity score of 4 or above
Sample sizeRandomised 1:1:1:1
InterventionTirzepatide, once-weekly subcutaneous
ComparatorPlacebo
Duration52 weeks
Primary endpointMASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis on liver histology at 52 weeks
Main resultTirzepatide was superior to placebo for MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Reported resolution rates differ between secondary sources: one gives 51.8%, 62.8% and 73.3% at 5, 10 and 15 mg against 13.2% placebo; another gives 62% at 15 mg against 10% placebo
NCT NCT04166773 · DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2401943 · PMID 38856224Last source check: 2026-07-24
How to read SYNERGY-NASH without over-reading it
1Who was eligibleAdults 18-80 with biopsy-confirmed MASH, stage F2 or F3 fibrosis, BMI 27-50, with or wit2What they receivedTirzepatide, once-weekly subcutaneous3What it was compared againstPlacebo4For how long52 weeks5What was measured firstMASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis on liver histology at 52 weeks6What the group average wasTirzepatide was superior to placebo for MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. R7What it does not tell youA group average is not a prediction for any individual reader.
Show this figure as a table
StepStageWhat happens
1Who was eligibleAdults 18-80 with biopsy-confirmed MASH, stage F2 or F3 fibrosis, BMI 27-50, with or without type 2 diabetes, NAFLD activity score of 4 or above
2What they receivedTirzepatide, once-weekly subcutaneous
3What it was compared againstPlacebo
4For how long52 weeks
5What was measured firstMASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis on liver histology at 52 weeks
6What the group average wasTirzepatide was superior to placebo for MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. Reported resolution rates differ between secondary sources: one gives 51.8%, 62.8% and 73.3% at 5, 10 and 15 mg against 13.2% placebo; another gives 62% at 15 mg against 10% placebo
7What it does not tell youA group average is not a prediction for any individual reader.
Strip any step and the result stops meaning what the trial found.
Mean weight reduction by drug and dose, from the trials that produced each figureSeparate trials, different durations and populations
Tirzepatide 15 mg (SURMOUNT-1)21%Oral semaglutide 25 mg, adherent (17%Injectable semaglutide 2.4 mg (SUR14%Oral semaglutide 25 mg, treatment-14%Orforglipron 17.2 mg (ATTAIN-1)12%Liraglutide (SCALE)8%
Show this figure as a table
ItemMean reductionEvidence
Tirzepatide 15 mg (SURMOUNT-1)21%Verified
Oral semaglutide 25 mg, adherent (OASIS 4)17%Verified
Injectable semaglutide 2.4 mg (SURMOUNT-5)14%Verified
Oral semaglutide 25 mg, treatment-policy (OASIS 4)14%Verified
Orforglipron 17.2 mg (ATTAIN-1)12%Provider-reported
Liraglutide (SCALE)8%Provider-reported
These come from different trials and are not a head-to-head comparison. Durations differ (64 to 72 weeks) and estimands differ. Only SURMOUNT-5 compared two of these drugs directly.
Price against efficacy, for the FDA-approved options
ProductStarting self-pay priceReported mean reductionTrial
Zepbound (tirzepatide) injectable$299/mo directabout 20.9% at 15 mgSURMOUNT-1, 72 weeks
Wegovy pill (oral semaglutide 25 mg)$149/mo starting dose13.6–16.6% depending on estimandOASIS 4, 64 weeks
Wegovy injectable (semaglutide 2.4 mg)$349/mo maintenanceabout 13.7%SURMOUNT-5, 72 weeks
Foundayo (orforglipron)$149/mo starting doseabout 11–12.4% at 17.2 mgATTAIN-1, 72 weeks
Both $149 products are the least effective approved options in this table. That does not make them bad choices — it makes a price comparison that omits efficacy an incomplete one.
Before publish — primary-source capture
  • Obtain the NEJM full text and record the exact resolution rate per arm with its estimand. Two secondary sources conflict at the 15 mg arm (73.3% vs 62%).

Questions readers actually ask

Does this apply to compounded versions?

No. The trial studied an FDA-approved product at studied doses.

Is this drug as effective as tirzepatide?

By mean reduction across separate trials, no. The efficacy ladder above sets out the figures with the trial that produced each one.

Cite this pageCC BY 4.0

GLP-1 Tirzepatide Review. “SYNERGY-NASH: Tirzepatide for MASH With Liver Fibrosis, Explained.” S.J Partners LLC, 2026-07-24. https://glp1tirzepatidereview.com/research/synergy-nash/

When quoting a figure, include the capture date shown beside it rather than the date you read this page. A price without its capture date is not a usable citation.

Report an error
Comparing 0 of 4